3 comments to “Compulsory cat registration in QLD – an expensive flop”

  1. Tegan | September 26, 2013 | Permalink

    Thanks for posting this analysis. I keep using examples like this to try to illustrate that cat registration isn’t a great idea. Seems the message doesn’t soak in easy.

  2. Kylie | September 26, 2013 | Permalink

    What a ridiculous piece of legislation that was. I can at least see benefits in registering a dog – the registration fee goes towards reuniting lost dogs with their families (yes, let’s pretend we believe it), creating and maintaining off-leash dog parks, and such like. But what benefit is there to me in registering a cat? And how could that possibly be enforced? My cat is indoors only. She is not registered and never will be. So I’m please this silly legislation has been repealed.

  3. Cheryl Venables | September 29, 2013 | Permalink

    Have always wondered how the registration and microchipping interact as one of my cats is prior 1998 NSW – I was told don’t bother by the council. Do they know what they are talking about – is it just revenue raising? For Qld not all cats can or should wear collars due to trees etc if they climb. Think its an excuse to define community cats from those owned. They would be in trouble if there were none as described in the great article by petrescue.com.au about the Christchurch earthquake and how the cats saved the city from rat infestation that must exist in all towns & cities . http://www.petrescue.com.au/library/articles/humane-cat-management