March 23, 2013Comments are closed.council pound, RSPCA
Dogs watch reporters at Moorook Animal Shelter (Image ABC Riverland)
In rural locations, community animal refuges tend to end up being run by whomever was passionate enough to see the niche and start to run them. Getting up early every morning and cleaning up dog shit, is not everyone’s idea of fun, so caring for the community’s pets tended to fall to one or two individuals willing to dedicated their properties to companion animals.
Most often, rural animal refuges are an asset to their community – a devoted band of volunteers, saving the ‘unsavable’ and, thanks to the reach of internet advertising, now reaching a whole new market of potential adopters. They might not have the best facilities, and they might not be using killing to make their operations more ‘efficient’. But the pets are absolutely their priority – and the animals are the ones to benefit as they are cared for as individuals, rather than being shipped to mega-pounds and simply becoming another statistic.
Which is why I was so disappointed to hear about the raid on Moorook Animal Shelter last week. Two hours from Adelaide, this animal refuge has been helping the animals of Moorook since 1999. Moorook Animal Shelter had been taking the unclaimed dogs, without any financial compensation, from three Riverland Councils; Waikerie/Loxton, Renmark/Paringa and Berri/Barmera and placing them into new homes. Dogs who would otherwise have been shot with a firearm if unclaimed.
The dogs are by all accounts well cared for. Up until the RSPCA visit, council staff had still been dropping animals at the facility. They are given an adequate diet. They are given treatment and care from a local vet. All dogs on site are wormed, heart wormed and flea treated monthly.
And then, the majority of the dogs are rehomed. They have placed nearly 300 dogs in a short few years. The adoption fee includes vaccinations, microchipping and desexing.
On the 6th March, the RSPCA SA visted the property, seizing seven dogs and a kitten. The property’s original permit for 37 dogs had been exceeded, with more than 80 dogs on site. Three dogs (Tommy, Bear and Wombles) and the kitten were killed.
This elderly dog had lived in a shelter for some time. He was killed because of age-related eye and hearing issues.
Tommy
Was about six years old. He had been blind for about 18 months.
The other dog who was killed was Bear. He was an approx 8 year old Red Heeler x who had arthritis, but had been being treated with cartrophen under advice from their vet.
The kitten was an unnamed new arrival, who had cat flu and who had been being treated.
The RSPCA maintain that the animals were all “humanely euthanased as a result of ongoing medical conditions, which were causing continued unmanageable suffering.”
Should these guys have been killed? The kitten had a treatable condition, while the dogs were suffering from age-related complaints. Without the RSPCA releasing vet reports declaring the nature of the other untreatable conditions, the idea that these animals were completely unsavable is implausible. No blind or deaf dog is medically hopeless.
The other dogs currently held at the RSPCA SA include; Gangsta, a great dane x. Had been being treated for the last 3 months for a skin condition. Bindi, a staffy who was being rehabilitated from a traumatic past. Buddy, a sharpei x. And Brandy, a three legged staffy. Their fates are unconfirmed.
The RSPCA returned to the Shelter the following week, and Today Tonight cameras were on site (see video below). They removed no further animals.
According to Moorook, the orders on the shelter are such;
1. All animals must be allowed 30 minutes exercise which can simply mean access to the exercise yards…..done, and they always have had.
2. We must tidy up some enclosures for loose wire and the like, this is simple and only applies to a minority of enclosures
3. All Kennels/pens must have concrete bases to allow for easy cleaning. So not a lot of work it would seem
They will be applying to council to increase the shelter’s approved animal quota and submitting a new development plan. This will included compliance with concrete flooring as directed. A working bee is being arranged (contact Moorook if you are able to help). They also need financial support.
There is no doubt that the animal lovers in South Australia need to step up and step in to help Moorook Animal Shelter. The community will need to help ensure that they are well-resourced and compliant into the future, and with effective adoptions meaning that all animals entering the facility are placed.
To allow councils to return to – the ironically RSPCA approved – program of shooting stray dogs, rather than caring for them, would be an appalling step backwards.
Let’s hope for the pet’s sakes, that a resolution can be reached.
Good luck Moorook, hope you get the help you need to get the shelter up to scratch. Sometimes I just wish the RSPCA would put as much time & effort into policing the Breeders, Puppy Farmers & BYBs (the ones causing the problems) as they do in hounding reputable shelters.
RSPCA – I keep hearing about the RSPCA – sadly the RSPCA of today is NOT The RSPCA of yesterday that I grew up with…a Dog is blind – so he is killed a dog is elderly had eye and health issues (undisclosed) he is killed – others are waiting and will silently be “done away with too” when they think the world is not watching…..I am so over the RSPCA. Why don’t you get onto the idiots who breed and breed and allow these animals to end up in the state they do….Good Luck Moorook we need people like and you and RSPCA needs to think before they act….
Name me one council pound that would pass this
“All animals must be allowed 30 minutes exercise which can simply mean access to the exercise yards”
I can understand why the blind and deaf doggies may have been taken in the first place, they can look very disturbed in a shelter environment – ie not just ‘blind’, what’s tragic is that if you are old, blind, deaf and have suffering joint pain, instead of findng you the right home the ONLY solution the RSPCA can imagine – even contemplate is kill :-(
The RSPCA take in PLENTY of money with low % of re-homings by comparison to the numbers they take in. Why can’t the RSPCA support Moorook by helping with the ground improvements they require Moorook to undertake, instead of spending more of the public money they campaign for in taking dogs who don’t need to be killed ……. and killing them?
I have a dog ANGUS (SHITZU/MALTESE) that I purchased from Moorook. I am happy with my dog – he was well looked after on visiting Moorook shelter. I hope you keep up the good work ladies & gents. Take care Gwen & Angus (pup).
I have 2 dogs that I got from Marook Animal Shelter, Harley is a kelpie cross and such a beautiful companion he cost me $150 he was vet checked, desexed and on Sentinel flea and worm tablets and that included micro chipping. When I got him Lola asked if I was interested in an older dog I could have just for the fee of the microchip, $50. So after a few months I went back and picked up an old overweight female Labrador.
I am proud to say that I have given both these dogs a decent home where they get the best of everything and a walk every day. The councils in the area pass on lost dogs to her but I bet they don’t help with the upkeep of the facility. Same as the RSPCA they should be trying to help her out, country dogs need help too. All the best Marook regards Neil Holbrook